Gigabyte GA-B450M K-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (94th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 6 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics25.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte B450M K
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B450M K-CF  (all builds)
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220831
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 20 '23 at 20:54
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 51%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$140
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
80.1% Excellent
Memory 82.3
1-Core 114
2-Core 227
79% 141 Pts
4-Core 420
8-Core 625
65% 522 Pts
64-Core 773
48% 773 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
Asus(1043 0525) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1162 MHz, MLim: 1950 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 23.2.1
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25.5% Poor
Lighting 32.5
Reflection 30
Parallax 41
26% 34.5 fps
MRender 34.1
Gravity 35.3
Splatting 20.8
24% 30.1 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 25.5%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
412GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAN20102
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 470
Write 404
Mixed 401
95% 425 MB/s
4K Read 31.6
4K Write 82
4K Mixed 32.9
133% 48.8 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 348
DQ Mixed 115
133% 222 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 102%
HEMA_16G HEMA_16GB 16GB
10GB free, PID 5500
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 106
Write 34.6
Mixed 27.6
57% 56.1 MB/s
4K Read 12.7
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
54% 4.3 MB/s
Poor: 10% Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown LD4BU008G-3200XG 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
110% Outstanding
MC Read 44.4
MC Write 40
MC Mixed 37.1
116% 40.5 GB/s
SC Read 26.3
SC Write 35.4
SC Mixed 31.3
88% 31 GB/s
Latency 76.3
52% 76.3 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 110%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B450M K-CF Builds (Compare 366 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 96%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 88%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B450M K-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $367
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback