Casper NIRVANA NOTEBOOK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.25% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive29.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemCasper NIRVANA NOTEBOOK  (all builds)
MotherboardCasper Casper Nirvana Notebook
Memory2.4 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130824
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 20 '23 at 17:03
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4000M-$259
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
47.5% Average
Memory 69.1
1-Core 46.3
2-Core 81.3
43% 65.6 Pts
4-Core 151
8-Core 158
20% 154 Pts
64-Core 160
10% 160 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Elitegroup(1019 999C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.25% Terrible
Lighting 1.9
Reflection 0.4
Parallax 0.9
2% 1.07 fps
MRender 1.3
Gravity 0.4
Splatting 0.8
1% 0.83 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.25%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB
68GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF4004RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 51 32 27 36 40 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
29.5% Poor
Read 407
Write 332
Mixed 246
SusWrite 60.1
58% 261 MB/s
4K Read 7.9
4K Write 20.5
4K Mixed 4.4
28% 10.9 MB/s
DQ Read 11.4
DQ Write 46.6
DQ Mixed 35.2
25% 31.1 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 29.5%
Great: 56%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMSO4GX3M1A1333C9 Hynix HMT325S6CFR8C-H9 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
32.7% Below average
MC Read 11.8
MC Write 12.1
MC Mixed 11.5
34% 11.8 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 7
SC Mixed 6.8
20% 6.83 GB/s
Latency 104
39% 104 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NIRVANA NOTEBOOK Builds (Compare 2,357 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Casper NIRVANA NOTEBOOK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback