Asus TUF GAMING B660M-PLUS D4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 209%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 112%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 216%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 111%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics194% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive464% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B660M-PLUS D4  (all builds)
Memory6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit 种颜色
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220401
Uptime2.4 Days
Run DateFeb 20 '23 at 10:40
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User CHN-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12600KF-$159
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Memory 80.9
1-Core 193
2-Core 396
116% 223 Pts
4-Core 754
8-Core 1,302
124% 1,028 Pts
64-Core 1,799
111% 1,799 Pts
Poor: 101%
This bench: 111%
Great: 117%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$879
Nvidia(10DE 2216) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 516.40
Performing below potential (77th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
194% Outstanding
Lighting 282
Reflection 258
Parallax 287
230% 276 fps
MRender 319
Gravity 240
Splatting 177
193% 245 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 194%
Great: 202%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Predator GM7000 1TB
458GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.A.F.12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1679 3178 3895 4469 3346 1330 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
464% Outstanding
Read 2,361
Write 3,005
Mixed 2,808
SusWrite 2983
632% 2,790 MB/s
4K Read 77.3
4K Write 187
4K Mixed 105
350% 123 MB/s
DQ Read 1,895
DQ Write 1640
DQ Mixed 1,810
1,345% 1,782 MB/s
Poor: 263%
This bench: 464%
Great: 593%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Acer BL.9BWWR.268 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
76.7% Very good
MC Read 28.6
MC Write 28.1
MC Mixed 26
79% 27.6 GB/s
SC Read 18.7
SC Write 27
SC Mixed 22.2
65% 22.6 GB/s
Latency 78.9
51% 78.9 ns
Poor: 77%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 163%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING B660M-PLUS D4 Builds (Compare 2,313 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B660M-PLUS D4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 108% - Outstanding Total price: $493
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback