Asus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 33% Sail boat	Desktop 90% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 34% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	32.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Motherboard	Asus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20191206
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	Feb 20 '23 at 09:31
Run Duration	208 Seconds
Run User	BEL-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$200 635,419 User benchmarks, average bench 86% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	85% Excellent	Memory 66.8 1-Core 146 2-Core 290 88% 168 Pts	4-Core 552 8-Core 960 91% 756 Pts	64-Core 1,405 87% 1,405 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 85% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 3351) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 528.49 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	32.8% Below average	Lighting 42.8 Reflection 41.9 Parallax 39.8 35% 41.5 fps	MRender 37.2 Gravity 42.5 Splatting 28.2 29% 36 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 32.8% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$190 68,849 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 309GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 50 51 51 51 52 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 71% Great: 124%
Samsung MZVLW512HMJP-000H7 512GB 850 User benchmarks, average bench 194% 363GB free Firmware: CXY70H7Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 428 411 411 415 418 416 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	250% Outstanding	Read 1,978 Write 1,515 Mixed 896 SusWrite 416 266% 1,202 MB/s	4K Read 60.1 4K Write 159 4K Mixed 81.1 279% 100 MB/s	DQ Read 1,422 DQ Write 1,232 DQ Mixed 996 837% 1,217 MB/s
Poor: 126% ↑ This bench: 250% Great: 245%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 376GB free Firmware: 15.01H15 SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 109 108 108 108 108 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	63.3% Good	Read 112 Write 100 Mixed 66 SusWrite 108 71% 96.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 1 177% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 63.3% Great: 69%
WD Blue 250GB (2008)-$80 11,055 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 88GB free Firmware: 01.01B01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 97 97 97 97 97 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	56.3% Above average	Read 98.8 Write 101 Mixed 69.6 SusWrite 97.1 68% 91.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1 184% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 56.3% Great: 61%
Jmicron Generic 320GB 857 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 241GB free Firmware: 0405 SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 20 20 20 20 20 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	21.2% Poor	Read 53.1 Write 32 Mixed 27.7 SusWrite 20.7 25% 33.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.6 112% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 21.2% Great: 52%
WDC WD10 JPVX-22JC3T0 1TB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 605GB free, PID 0611 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 18 19 19 23 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	15.2% Very poor	Read 51.2 Write 33.8 Mixed 28.7 SusWrite 19.3 41% 33.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.9 71% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 15.2% Great: 21%
ST500LM0 12 HN-M500MBB 500GB 319 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 365GB free, PID 2329 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 38 38 38 38 38 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	21.5% Poor	Read 49.8 Write 39.1 Mixed 34 SusWrite 37.7 53% 40.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1 102% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 21.5% Great: 22%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Patriot PSD48G266681 2x8GB 6,425 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	58.1% Above average	MC Read 23 MC Write 18.1 MC Mixed 21 59% 20.7 GB/s	SC Read 18.9 SC Write 18.2 SC Mixed 17.7 52% 18.3 GB/s	Latency 109 37% 109 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 58.1% Great: 95%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF B450-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 5,404 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 78%

Battleship

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 73%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450-PLUS GAMING

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $84Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	1,390x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	808x
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $199Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	471x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $290Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	424x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	295x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $240Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	293x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	152x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	130x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	124x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $39Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	389x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	241x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	206x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 87% - Excellent

Total price: $441

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16