Asus X99-A II

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive262% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus X99-A II  (all builds)
Memory58.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170810
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateFeb 20 '23 at 07:50
Run Duration346 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 17%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6850K-$115
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
92.8% Outstanding
Memory 93.3
1-Core 121
2-Core 266
89% 160 Pts
4-Core 496
8-Core 800
79% 648 Pts
64-Core 980
61% 980 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 92.8%
Great: 93%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 2075 MHz, MLim: 2622 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 528.24
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
102% Outstanding
Lighting 130
Reflection 133
Parallax 122
106% 128 fps
MRender 115
Gravity 131
Splatting 111
97% 119 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 102%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SHGP31-500GM-2 500GB
341GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 41060C20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1170 1000 1001 993 990 990 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
262% Outstanding
Read 2,650
Write 2,247
Mixed 1,709
SusWrite 1,024
426% 1,907 MB/s
4K Read 57
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 73.7
236% 78.3 MB/s
DQ Read 496
DQ Write 376
DQ Mixed 496
355% 456 MB/s
Poor: 208%
This bench: 262%
Great: 370%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 1TB
363GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 589 739 744 743 745 745 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
154% Outstanding
Read 1036
Write 850
Mixed 580
SusWrite 717
178% 796 MB/s
4K Read 41.3
4K Write 83.3
4K Mixed 51.7
173% 58.8 MB/s
DQ Read 351
DQ Write 300
DQ Mixed 318
240% 323 MB/s
Poor: 120%
This bench: 154%
Great: 445%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 240GB
218GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 590 315 305 305 304 305 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
130% Outstanding
Read 1020
Write 844
Mixed 606
SusWrite 354
157% 706 MB/s
4K Read 41
4K Write 81.2
4K Mixed 49.8
169% 57.3 MB/s
DQ Read 348
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 334
251% 335 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 130%
Great: 133%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
233GB free
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1356 312 312 312 311 312 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
185% Outstanding
Read 1,998
Write 1,460
Mixed 651
SusWrite 486
254% 1,148 MB/s
4K Read 39.4
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 47.5
177% 64.4 MB/s
DQ Read 545
DQ Write 419
DQ Mixed 542
389% 502 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 185%
Great: 236%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63
3TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 86 90 88 90 93 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
40.2% Average
Read 48.5
Write 86.4
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 90
53% 71.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 0.4
188% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 40.2%
Great: 90%
H/W RAID10 2TB
336GB free
Firmware: 0960
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 143 173 202 189 182 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
167% Outstanding
Read 405
Write 20.7
Mixed 28.7
SusWrite 178
114% 158 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.5
130% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 167%
Great: 129%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLT8G4D30AETA.K16FE 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
139% Outstanding
MC Read 50.3
MC Write 60.5
MC Mixed 54.6
158% 55.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 23.4
SC Mixed 23
60% 20.8 GB/s
Latency 61.4
65% 61.4 ns
Poor: 119%
This bench: 139%
Great: 153%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-A II Builds (Compare 1,405 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus X99-A II - $294

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $677
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback