Acer Aspire S5-371

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics5.06% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive64.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire S5-371  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Minicooper_SK
Memory1.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160415
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 20 '23 at 03:28
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6500U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
32.5% Below average
Memory 35.7
1-Core 63.8
2-Core 125
40% 74.8 Pts
4-Core 165
8-Core 191
23% 178 Pts
64-Core 185
12% 185 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Acer(1025 1080) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
5.06% Terrible
Lighting 5.7
Reflection 3.8
Parallax 6.1
5% 5.2 fps
MRender 8.7
Gravity 0.2
Splatting 11.2
6% 6.7 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.06%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon CV1-8B512 512GB
437GB free (System drive)
Firmware: G891201
SusWrite @10s intervals: 282 251 347 333 319 322 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
64.3% Good
Read 362
Write 325
Mixed 280
SusWrite 309
72% 319 MB/s
4K Read 16.3
4K Write 34
4K Mixed 19.6
68% 23.3 MB/s
DQ Read 257
DQ Write 195
DQ Mixed 194
154% 215 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K4E8E304EE-EGCE 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM LPDDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
29.2% Poor
MC Read 10
MC Write 11.7
MC Mixed 10.2
30% 10.6 GB/s
SC Read 5.8
SC Write 11.1
SC Mixed 7.4
23% 8.1 GB/s
Latency 223
18% 223 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 29.2%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire S5-371 Builds (Compare 56 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire S5-371

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback