Lenovo 81UT

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.08% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory36GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 36GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 81UT  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory24.4 GB free of 36 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210514
Uptime4.8 Days
Run DateFeb 20 '23 at 02:50
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3200U
FP5, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
46.7% Average
Memory 66.7
1-Core 67.6
2-Core 130
52% 88 Pts
4-Core 156
8-Core 157
21% 156 Pts
64-Core 166
10% 166 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 3 Graphics
Legend(17AA 3804) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.40.46
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
3.08% Terrible
Lighting 3.1
Reflection 5.5
Parallax 4.7
2% 4.43 fps
MRender 5.6
Gravity 3.3
Splatting 6
4% 4.97 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.08%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
T-force 1TB 1TB
609GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0823A0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 393
Write 301
Mixed 314
75% 336 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 52
4K Mixed 19.9
90% 32 MB/s
DQ Read 167
DQ Write 220
DQ Mixed 46.7
76% 145 MB/s
Poor: 48% Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3200C20S4/32GX Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 35GB
2400, 2400 MHz
32767, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
42% Average
MC Read 15.1
MC Write 13.9
MC Mixed 14.2
41% 14.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 14
SC Mixed 14.4
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 42%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 81UT Builds (Compare 592 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81UT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback