Asus Q87M-A/TYCO/SI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.6% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive52.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
16 months ago, 16 months ago.
MotherboardAsus Q87M-A/TYCO/SI  (all builds)
Memory1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140821
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 20 '23 at 01:52
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 57%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4170-$20
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
39.9% Below average
Memory 47.4
1-Core 85.3
2-Core 149
52% 93.9 Pts
4-Core 183
8-Core 211
26% 197 Pts
64-Core 222
14% 222 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)
Asus(1043 8534) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4835
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
2.6% Terrible
Lighting 2.9
Reflection 2
Parallax 3.9
2% 2.93 fps
MRender 4.7
Gravity 2.1
Splatting 4.3
3% 3.7 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.6%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend TS128GMSA370 128GB
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P1225CH1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 163 169 168 185 165 MB/s
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
52.6% Above average
Read 275
Write 166
Mixed 195
SusWrite 169
45% 201 MB/s
4K Read 14.2
4K Write 36.6
4K Mixed 21.6
69% 24.1 MB/s
DQ Read 246
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 166
138% 201 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 78%
WD Purple Surveillance 2TB (2017)-$70
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 131 138 131 141 139 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
77.5% Very good
Read 134
Write 124
Mixed 61.7
SusWrite 136
83% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
170% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown D3-55DK114SV-11 2x2GB
2 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Relative performance (0th percentile)
27.9% Poor
MC Read 9.3
MC Write 11.9
MC Mixed 9.4
29% 10.2 GB/s
SC Read 4.9
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 6.2
19% 6.63 GB/s
Latency 171
24% 171 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Q87M-A/TYCO/SI Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus Q87M-A/TYCO/SI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 19% - Very poor Total price: $135
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback