MSI H270 GAMING M3 (MS-7A62)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive89.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7A62
MotherboardMSI H270 GAMING M3 (MS-7A62)  (all builds)
Memory9.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180703
Uptime2.3 Days
Run DateFeb 19 '23 at 19:24
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 36%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
74.2% Very good
Memory 83.7
1-Core 108
2-Core 169
72% 120 Pts
4-Core 349
8-Core 595
57% 472 Pts
64-Core 609
38% 609 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 84%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Patriot Ignite 480GB-$148
131GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM01.7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 380 223 403 174 321 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
89.6% Excellent
Read 482
Write 441
Mixed 339
SusWrite 271
86% 383 MB/s
4K Read 30.8
4K Write 63.9
4K Mixed 35.3
126% 43.3 MB/s
DQ Read 322
DQ Write 353
DQ Mixed 199
188% 291 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 89.6%
Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
728GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 175 168 169 174 165 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 178
Write 198
Mixed 81.1
SusWrite 171
115% 157 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 100%
Great: 113%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 38 37 38 38 38 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
20.8% Poor
Read 33.9
Write 34.1
Mixed 30.9
SusWrite 37.4
25% 34.1 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1
240% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 20.8%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965669-019.A00G 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
39.6% Below average
MC Read 13.8
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 11.8
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 10.7
33% 11.7 GB/s
Latency 74
54% 74 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H270 GAMING M3 (MS-7A62) Builds (Compare 919 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: MSI H270 GAMING M3 (MS-7A62) - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $575
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback