IRU 317

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics91.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive36.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemIRU 317  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock H310CM-HDV
Memory9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190624
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 19 '23 at 17:51
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 17%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700F-$279
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
94.3% Outstanding
Memory 86.2
1-Core 134
2-Core 270
90% 163 Pts
4-Core 550
8-Core 938
90% 744 Pts
64-Core 1,057
65% 1,057 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 94.3%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$271
Nvidia(10DE 1E89) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 528.49
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
91.8% Outstanding
Lighting 115
Reflection 130
Parallax 112
94% 119 fps
MRender 137
Gravity 97.3
Splatting 94.1
88% 109 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 91.8%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$27
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 218 136 4.1 74 39 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
36.1% Below average
Read 472
Write 414
Mixed 12.3
SusWrite 82
54% 245 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 0.4
46% 11.2 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 92%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$32
743GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8R0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 175 170 169 174 175 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
96.7% Outstanding
Read 165
Write 175
Mixed 20.8
SusWrite 172
96% 133 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
147% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 96.7%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFS824A.C8FDD1 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
76.7% Very good
MC Read 29.7
MC Write 30
MC Mixed 22.3
78% 27.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 28.8
SC Mixed 22.3
65% 22.8 GB/s
Latency 71.1
56% 71.1 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 317 Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship

System: IRU 317

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $577
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback