Acer Aspire E5-574G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.48% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive35.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (79%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
15 months ago, 15 months ago.
SystemAcer Aspire E5-574G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Zoro_SL
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160304
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 19 '23 at 01:05
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 79%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6500U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
40.7% Average
Memory 49.3
1-Core 52.3
2-Core 109
41% 70.1 Pts
4-Core 186
8-Core 188
25% 187 Pts
64-Core 177
11% 177 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Acer(1025 100C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4599
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
5.48% Terrible
Lighting 6.2
Reflection 9.8
Parallax 6
5% 7.33 fps
MRender 7.2
Gravity 5.6
Splatting 9.6
6% 7.47 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.48%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$42
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z33130RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 82 69 76 75 83 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
35.2% Below average
Read 187
Write 83
Mixed 120
SusWrite 80.6
26% 118 MB/s
4K Read 14.9
4K Write 19.6
4K Mixed 12.3
49% 15.6 MB/s
DQ Read 196
DQ Write 167
DQ Mixed 33.3
65% 132 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 78%
Seagate ST2000LM003 HN-M201RAD 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 2BE10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 126 123 124 124 125 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
64.9% Good
Read 112
Write 88.4
Mixed 67.8
SusWrite 113
70% 95.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 0.8
202% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Teikon TMT41GS6BFR8A-PBHJ 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
51.5% Above average
MC Read 18.8
MC Write 20.3
MC Mixed 17.8
54% 19 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 16.9
SC Mixed 15
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 163
24% 163 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire E5-574G Builds (Compare 415 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire E5-574G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback