Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 26% Raft	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 20.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	3.77% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	52% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-7800 APU (2014 D.Ka) 15,719 User benchmarks, average bench 41% FM2+, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	20.6% Poor	Memory 25.3 1-Core 46.6 2-Core 70.8 27% 47.6 Pts	4-Core 86.6 8-Core 130 13% 108 Pts	64-Core 96.8 6% 96.8 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 20.6% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 440 14,286 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Asus(1043 83B7) 1GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	3.77% Terrible	Lighting 4.5 Reflection 7.6 Parallax 2.5 4% 4.87 fps	MRender 6.3 Gravity 4.9 Splatting 3.8 4% 5 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.77% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSDPR-CL100-240-G3 240GB 1,084 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 39GB free (System drive) Firmware: V4.7 SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 94 85 84 72 71 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	52% Above average	Read 396 Write 294 Mixed 266 SusWrite 97.8 59% 264 MB/s	4K Read 20.9 4K Write 41.8 4K Mixed 16.7 75% 26.5 MB/s	DQ Read 163 DQ Write 180 DQ Mixed 37 65% 127 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 52% Great: 89%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 757GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 168 170 169 172 171 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	96.8% Outstanding	Read 168 Write 137 Mixed 99.3 SusWrite 169 105% 143 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1.2 226% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 96.8% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT25664BA186D-8FAE 2x2GB 214 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	24% Poor	MC Read 10 MC Write 6.9 MC Mixed 10.1 26% 9 GB/s	SC Read 5.1 SC Write 5.2 SC Mixed 6.4 16% 5.57 GB/s	Latency 284 14% 284 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 24% Great: 37%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16