Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 44% Speed boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	3.71% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	58.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A10-7800 APU (2014 D.Ka) 15,719 User benchmarks, average bench 41% FM2+, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	42.7% Average	Memory 65.3 1-Core 55.5 2-Core 81.8 44% 67.5 Pts	4-Core 124 8-Core 91.6 15% 108 Pts	64-Core 103 6% 103 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 42.7% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 440 14,286 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Asus(1043 83B7) 1GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	3.71% Terrible	Lighting 4.4 Reflection 7.5 Parallax 2.4 4% 4.77 fps	MRender 6.3 Gravity 5 Splatting 3.7 4% 5 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.71% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSDPR-CL100-240-G3 240GB 1,084 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 48GB free (System drive) Firmware: V4.7 SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 132 140 136 142 143 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	58.8% Above average	Read 413 Write 350 Mixed 303 SusWrite 149 68% 304 MB/s	4K Read 25.8 4K Write 52.3 4K Mixed 16.1 87% 31.4 MB/s	DQ Read 161 DQ Write 177 DQ Mixed 33.3 63% 124 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 58.8% Great: 89%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 757GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 162 165 161 165 167 MB/s Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	Read 195 Write 148 Mixed 103 SusWrite 164 112% 152 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1.1 214% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial CT25664BA186D-8FAE 2x2GB 214 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz Performing below potential (37^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	31.8% Below average	MC Read 13.2 MC Write 7.7 MC Mixed 13.3 33% 11.4 GB/s	SC Read 6.6 SC Write 6.6 SC Mixed 8.5 21% 7.23 GB/s	Latency 113 35% 113 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 31.8% Great: 37%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16