Fujitsu PRIMERGY TX150 S8

Performance Results


Gaming 26% Raft	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 24% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	33.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	93.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Fujitsu PRIMERGY TX150 S8 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D3079-A1
Memory	12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190624
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 18 '23 at 11:09
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	9%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2470 0 243 User benchmarks, average bench 69% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	67.1% Good	Memory 80.4 1-Core 74.7 2-Core 148 60% 101 Pts	4-Core 291 8-Core 506 48% 398 Pts	64-Core 690 43% 690 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 67.1% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 85D1) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 526.98 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	33.7% Below average	Lighting 44.5 Reflection 41.5 Parallax 39.6 36% 41.9 fps	MRender 37.3 Gravity 42.9 Splatting 28.1 29% 36.1 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 33.7% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 137GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 365 315 315 305 303 304 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	93.2% Outstanding	Read 479 Write 457 Mixed 438 SusWrite 318 95% 423 MB/s	4K Read 34.4 4K Write 54.8 4K Mixed 41.6 134% 43.6 MB/s	DQ Read 312 DQ Write 253 DQ Mixed 278 210% 281 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 93.2% Great: 128%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$27 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 888GB free Firmware: CC63 SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 187 191 190 190 189 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	109% Outstanding	Read 190 Write 166 Mixed 82.2 SusWrite 190 114% 157 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.9 171% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT351R7CFR4A 4x4GB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 4 of 6 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	46.7% Average	MC Read 18.4 MC Write 16.8 MC Mixed 15.2 48% 16.8 GB/s	SC Read 12 SC Write 10.1 SC Mixed 9.9 30% 10.7 GB/s	Latency 79.8 50% 79.8 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 46.7% Great: 99%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIMERGY TX150 S8 Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

System: Fujitsu PRIMERGY TX150 S8

CPU
Xeon E5-2470 0IntelBench 69%, 243 samples	5x
Xeon E5-2420 0IntelBench 58%, 1,039 samples	2x
Xeon E5-2403 0IntelBench 49%, 80 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	3x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	2x
Quadro FX 550NvidiaBench 0%, 75 samples	2x

SSD
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	5x
Green 120GB (2018)WD $59Bench 43%, 69,933 samples	2x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	1x

RAM
HMT31GR7EFR4A 1x8GBHynixBench 27%, 4 samples	2x
HMT351R7CFR4A 3x4GBHynixBench 72%, 2 samples	2x
BLS4G3D1609DS 2x4GBCrucialBench 43%, 4,102 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 36% - Below average

Total price: $250

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $288	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16