Fujitsu PRIMERGY TX150 S8

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics33.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive82.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemFujitsu PRIMERGY TX150 S8  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3079-A1
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190624
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 18 '23 at 10:44
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2470 0
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
65.8% Good
Memory 81.5
1-Core 76.6
2-Core 148
61% 102 Pts
4-Core 270
8-Core 568
49% 419 Pts
64-Core 718
44% 718 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 526.98
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
33.8% Below average
Lighting 44.5
Reflection 41.7
Parallax 39.8
36% 42 fps
MRender 37.4
Gravity 43.2
Splatting 28.3
29% 36.3 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
127GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 323 309 314 316 317 315 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
82.6% Excellent
Read 475
Write 450
Mixed 311
SusWrite 316
87% 388 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 57.5
4K Mixed 28.9
101% 36.2 MB/s
DQ Read 324
DQ Write 260
DQ Mixed 260
203% 281 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 128%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
888GB free
Firmware: CC63
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 191 190 190 190 195 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 202
Write 148
Mixed 79.5
SusWrite 191
113% 155 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
177% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 113%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351R7CFR4A 4x4GB
4 of 6 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
67.9% Good
MC Read 29.2
MC Write 24.7
MC Mixed 24
74% 26 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 10.8
SC Mixed 10.8
33% 11.7 GB/s
Latency 77.9
51% 77.9 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 99%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIMERGY TX150 S8 Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Fujitsu PRIMERGY TX150 S8

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 36% - Below average Total price: $250
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $37
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback