Medion MD35239

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 72%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics74.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive199% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMedion MD35239  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION B460H6-EM
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1280 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211116
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 18 '23 at 09:48
Run Duration227 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400-$124
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
91.4% Outstanding
Memory 93.1
1-Core 123
2-Core 241
86% 152 Pts
4-Core 483
8-Core 712
74% 598 Pts
64-Core 916
57% 916 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 91.4%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
Zotac(19DA 9538) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3600 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 528.49
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
74.6% Very good
Lighting 93
Reflection 93.5
Parallax 87.6
76% 91.4 fps
MRender 118
Gravity 81.2
Splatting 74
72% 90.9 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme E12S-512G-PHISON-SSD-B27B 512GB
263GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM22.6 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1207 516 380 463 487 370 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
199% Outstanding
Read 1,347
Write 2,285
Mixed 1437
SusWrite 570
319% 1410 MB/s
4K Read 45.4
4K Write 163
4K Mixed 75.5
252% 94.6 MB/s
DQ Read 739
DQ Write 666
DQ Mixed 439
401% 615 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 199%
Great: 204%
Fanxiang S101 256GB
101GB free
Firmware: HPS2227F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 455 448 450 445 400 134 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
83.1% Excellent
Read 468
Write 451
Mixed 364
SusWrite 389
94% 418 MB/s
4K Read 31.1
4K Write 83
4K Mixed 12.4
107% 42.2 MB/s
DQ Read 178
DQ Write 289
DQ Mixed 16.3
74% 161 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 83.1%
Great: 98%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
58GB free
Firmware: SBFK61K1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 409 171 69 68 64 6.6 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
75.3% Very good
Read 484
Write 381
Mixed 362
SusWrite 131
76% 340 MB/s
4K Read 28.8
4K Write 73.1
4K Mixed 29.6
120% 43.8 MB/s
DQ Read 209
DQ Write 303
DQ Mixed 166
151% 226 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 100%
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
40GB free
Firmware: S1Z40102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 452 446 444 75 107 93 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
86.4% Excellent
Read 495
Write 441
Mixed 418
SusWrite 270
91% 406 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 80.3
4K Mixed 29.2
127% 46.8 MB/s
DQ Read 229
DQ Write 308
DQ Mixed 47.9
98% 195 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 86.4%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1G44AB0-CWE Crucial CT8G4DFRA32A.C8FP 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
70.9% Very good
MC Read 26.1
MC Write 26.5
MC Mixed 19.8
69% 24.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 34.9
SC Mixed 23.2
70% 24.5 GB/s
Latency 61.9
65% 61.9 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MD35239 Builds (Compare 23 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Gunboat

System: Medion MD35239

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $319
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback