Acer Aspire A715-41G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics27.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive87% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Aspire A715-41G  (all builds)
MotherboardPK Azalea_PKS
Memory8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200505
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 18 '23 at 06:29
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3550H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
30.6% Below average
Memory 19
1-Core 63.9
2-Core 123
35% 68.6 Pts
4-Core 226
8-Core 365
36% 295 Pts
64-Core 396
24% 396 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
Acer(1025 142E) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.10.28
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
27.6% Poor
Lighting 38.1
Reflection 62.7
Parallax 38.4
31% 46.4 fps
MRender 50.6
Gravity 37.3
Splatting 0.2
21% 29.4 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 27.6%
Great: 43%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AA 512GB
183GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFK52.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 762 49 65 102 56 95 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
87% Excellent
Read 729
Write 877
Mixed 684
SusWrite 188
139% 620 MB/s
4K Read 26.8
4K Write 52.3
4K Mixed 33.4
111% 37.5 MB/s
DQ Read 295
DQ Write 231
DQ Mixed 346
236% 290 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 87%
Great: 185%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR26D4S9S8HJ-8 CB8GS2666.C8RT 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
34.7% Below average
MC Read 7.2
MC Write 7.3
MC Mixed 25
38% 13.2 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 7.9
SC Mixed 11.4
25% 8.67 GB/s
Latency 328
12% 328 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire A715-41G Builds (Compare 388 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire A715-41G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback