HP Pavilion Desktop TP01-1xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics4.33% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemHP Pavilion Desktop TP01-1xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8767
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220302
Uptime2 Days
Run DateFeb 18 '23 at 06:29
Run Duration414 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400-$124
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
90.2% Outstanding
Memory 90.2
1-Core 123
2-Core 242
85% 152 Pts
4-Core 486
8-Core 744
76% 615 Pts
64-Core 908
56% 908 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 90.2%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
HP(103C 8767) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1404
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
4.33% Terrible
Lighting 5.8
Reflection 7.8
Parallax 6.5
5% 6.7 fps
MRender 9.3
Gravity 5.7
Splatting 0.1
4% 5.03 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.33%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G-1006 512GB
411GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS2
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,308
Write 1,453
Mixed 1,054
284% 1,271 MB/s
4K Read 41.7
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 58.3
196% 70.3 MB/s
DQ Read 861
DQ Write 634
DQ Mixed 747
558% 747 MB/s
Poor: 88% Great: 214%
Rsh-339 ASM1153E 4TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 159
Write 136
Mixed 92.4
96% 129 MB/s
4K Read 17.1
4K Write 9.9
4K Mixed 1
1,007% 9.33 MB/s
DQ Read 1.1
DQ Write 13.4
DQ Mixed 1.3
30% 5.27 MB/s
Poor: 20% Great: 124%
Rsh-339 ASM1153E 4TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 194
Write 171
Mixed 89.9
112% 152 MB/s
4K Read 18.1
4K Write 10
4K Mixed 0.8
1,028% 9.63 MB/s
DQ Read 1.1
DQ Write 13.8
DQ Mixed 1.2
30% 5.37 MB/s
Poor: 20% Great: 124%
WD easystore 25FB 4TB
881GB free, PID 25fb
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 132
Write 78.7
Mixed 96.9
123% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
65% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 17% Great: 71%
WD My Book 25ED 6TB
242GB free, PID 25ed
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 108
Write 95.2
Mixed 91
124% 98.1 MB/s
4K Read 10.1
4K Write 8.4
4K Mixed 0.6
344% 6.37 MB/s
DQ Read 0.4
DQ Write 8.9
DQ Mixed 0.6
325% 3.3 MB/s
Poor: 31% Great: 108%
ASMT 2115 4TB
1.5TB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 157
Write 71.1
Mixed 53.4
101% 93.9 MB/s
4K Read 12
4K Write 9.2
4K Mixed 0.7
381% 7.3 MB/s
DQ Read 0.4
DQ Write 12.1
DQ Mixed 0.8
440% 4.43 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 80%
WD My Book 25DA 4TB
1.5TB free, PID 25da
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 163
Write 160
Mixed 126
189% 150 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
133% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 68%
WD easystore 25FB 4TB
428GB free, PID 25fb
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 125
Write 142
Mixed 111
163% 126 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
126% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 17% Great: 71%
WD easystore 264D 8TB
2.5TB free, PID 264d
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 132
Write 146
Mixed 141
183% 140 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 1
224% 8.43 MB/s
Poor: 21% Great: 99%
WD easystore 2647 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 2647
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 69.3
Write 112
Mixed 72.7
115% 84.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 6.5
4K Mixed 0.7
251% 2.97 MB/s
Poor: 19% Great: 65%
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB
2.5TB free, PID 25e2
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 91.7
Write 84.7
Mixed 61.9
99% 79.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.2
40% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 59%
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB
595GB free, PID 25e2
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 68.5
Write 51.2
Mixed 53.2
71% 57.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.2
40% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 59%
WD easystore 2647 5TB
1TB free, PID 2647
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 77.7
Write 96.2
Mixed 61.9
102% 78.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 0.6
139% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 17% Great: 66%
WD easystore 2647 5TB
43GB free, PID 2647
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 120
Write 109
Mixed 78.3
127% 102 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 8.9
4K Mixed 0.7
330% 3.53 MB/s
DQ Read 0.4
DQ Write 10.3
DQ Mixed 0.5
369% 3.73 MB/s
Poor: 17% Great: 66%
ASMT 2115 240GB
137GB free, PID 1153
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 210
Write 151
Mixed 154
209% 172 MB/s
4K Read 17.2
4K Write 23.4
4K Mixed 15.9
1,400% 18.8 MB/s
DQ Read 15.4
DQ Write 21
DQ Mixed 17
1,350% 17.8 MB/s
Poor: 29% Great: 188%
WD easystore 2647 4TB
3.5TB free, PID 2647
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 84
Write 102
Mixed 72.3
112% 86.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 0.9
207% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 19% Great: 65%
WD easystore 2648 2TB
776GB free, PID 2648
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 87.8
Write 84
Mixed 58.9
96% 76.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.3
159% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 17% Great: 65%
WD easystore 2625 2TB
805GB free, PID 2625
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 133
Write 115
Mixed 77.1
132% 108 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.3
171% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 24% Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFRA266.C8FE Hynix HMA81GU6DJR8N-XN 16GB
2667, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
63.2% Good
MC Read 25
MC Write 22.6
MC Mixed 18
62% 21.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 25
SC Mixed 20.3
57% 19.8 GB/s
Latency 67
60% 67 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion Desktop TP01-1xxx Builds (Compare 725 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Desktop TP01-1xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $124
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback