MSI B450 GAMING PRO CARBON MAX WIFI (MS-7B85)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics48.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B85
MotherboardMSI B450 GAMING PRO CARBON MAX WIFI (MS-7B85)  (all builds)
Memory41.4 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220725
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 17 '23 at 19:57
Run Duration242 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 28%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$230
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 81.1
1-Core 171
2-Core 343
105% 198 Pts
4-Core 676
8-Core 1,214
114% 945 Pts
64-Core 2,152
133% 2,152 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 104%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1326 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 23.2.1
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
48.5% Average
Lighting 61.8
Reflection 59.8
Parallax 79.4
50% 67 fps
MRender 59.9
Gravity 65.6
Splatting 43.7
45% 56.4 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$107
782GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,483
Write 2,434
Mixed 1579
482% 2,165 MB/s
4K Read 43.8
4K Write 97.1
4K Mixed 56.5
190% 65.8 MB/s
DQ Read 711
DQ Write 363
DQ Mixed 536
398% 537 MB/s
Poor: 274% Great: 488%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$100
220GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 83.2
Write 85.9
Mixed 66
59% 78.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
171% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 46% Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87
618GB free
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 82.5
Write 93.7
Mixed 60.5
59% 78.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 0.5
206% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87
4.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 121
Write 169
Mixed 81.2
92% 124 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 0.9
282% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 90%
Seagate ST10000VN0008-2JJ101 10TB
8.5TB free
Firmware: SC61
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 114
Write 116
Mixed 82.2
77% 104 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 1.2
1,173% 9.4 MB/s
Poor: 36% Great: 99%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$34
674GB free
Firmware: 05.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 91.8
Write 77.4
Mixed 50.1
54% 73.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
128% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 76%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$34
11GB free
Firmware: 05.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2.2
Write 6.5
Mixed 5
4% 4.57 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
29% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 76%
VendorCo ProductCode 4GB
4GB free, PID 5678
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 17.9
Write 3.2
Mixed 2.5
7% 7.87 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
10% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2Z3600C18 CMK32GX4M2Z3600C18 CMK16GX4M2Z3600C18 CMK32GX4M2Z3600C18 48GB
2667, 2667, 2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 16384, 8192, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
89.9% Excellent
MC Read 36.9
MC Write 32.6
MC Mixed 29.8
94% 33.1 GB/s
SC Read 24.5
SC Write 19.1
SC Mixed 29.2
69% 24.3 GB/s
Latency 78.6
51% 78.6 ns
Poor: 77%
This bench: 89.9%
Great: 128%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B450 GAMING PRO CARBON MAX WIFI (MS-7B85) Builds (Compare 2,498 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 109%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 103%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI B450 GAMING PRO CARBON MAX WIFI (MS-7B85)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 101% - Outstanding Total price: $579
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback