MSI MPG Z690 EDGE WIFI DDR4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 263%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 129%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 334%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (90th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 10 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 134%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics202% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive535% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
15 months ago, 15 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D31
MotherboardMSI MPG Z690 EDGE WIFI DDR4  (all builds)
Memory25.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230110
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 17 '23 at 15:23
Run Duration304 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-13900K-$461
U3E1, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 5.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
134% Outstanding
Memory 95.5
1-Core 231
2-Core 462
137% 263 Pts
4-Core 922
8-Core 1,692
156% 1,307 Pts
64-Core 4,115
255% 4,115 Pts
Poor: 123%
This bench: 134%
Great: 135%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$435
Gigabyte(1458 4038) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 528.49
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
202% Outstanding
Lighting 297
Reflection 266
Parallax 334
242% 299 fps
MRender 325
Gravity 248
Splatting 180
197% 251 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 202%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN850X NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$89
728GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 620311WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4129 3677 967 980 1031 873 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
535% Outstanding
Read 4,482
Write 4,486
Mixed 3,458
SusWrite 1,943
806% 3,592 MB/s
4K Read 88.6
4K Write 326
4K Mixed 115
454% 177 MB/s
DQ Read 2,652
DQ Write 1,809
DQ Mixed 2,182
1,642% 2,215 MB/s
Poor: 251%
This bench: 535%
Great: 598%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
499GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 478 485 487 488 487 490 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
130% Outstanding
Read 512
Write 484
Mixed 455
SusWrite 486
109% 484 MB/s
4K Read 41.5
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 60.9
207% 76 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 149
166% 282 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 130%
Great: 133%
Emtec X300 2TB
463GB free
Firmware: EDFM00.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1514 391 396 835 1064 393 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
256% Outstanding
Read 1,060
Write 404
Mixed 736
SusWrite 766
165% 741 MB/s
4K Read 56.7
4K Write 261
4K Mixed 90
340% 136 MB/s
DQ Read 1,324
DQ Write 1,524
DQ Mixed 1291
1,009% 1,380 MB/s
Poor: 152%
This bench: 256%
Great: 257%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$140
420GB free
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1623 1042 606 603 604 604 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
275% Outstanding
Read 2,076
Write 1730
Mixed 988
SusWrite 847
314% 1,410 MB/s
4K Read 50.3
4K Write 209
4K Mixed 72.2
279% 110 MB/s
DQ Read 1,128
DQ Write 1,370
DQ Mixed 904
777% 1,134 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 275%
Great: 254%
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: RVT24B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 478 485 488 488 487 490 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
136% Outstanding
Read 514
Write 486
Mixed 447
SusWrite 486
109% 483 MB/s
4K Read 47.8
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 67.1
224% 79.7 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 323
DQ Mixed 346
260% 348 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 136%
Great: 133%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-3600C16-8GTZN 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
127% Outstanding
MC Read 46.7
MC Write 45.7
MC Mixed 43.9
130% 45.4 GB/s
SC Read 30.1
SC Write 50.2
SC Mixed 39.4
114% 39.9 GB/s
Latency 55.7
72% 55.7 ns
Poor: 77%
This bench: 127%
Great: 143%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MPG Z690 EDGE WIFI DDR4 (MS-7D31) Builds (Compare 10,067 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 209%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 115%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 230%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG Z690 EDGE WIFI DDR4 - $170

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 113% - Outstanding Total price: $927
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback