Asus GL503VM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive57.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (70%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus GL503VM  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK GL503VM
Memory27.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190429
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateFeb 17 '23 at 12:46
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User SAU-User
Background CPU 70%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
35.2% Below average
Memory 33.5
1-Core 41.1
2-Core 75.9
29% 50.2 Pts
4-Core 198
8-Core 317
32% 258 Pts
64-Core 348
22% 348 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 35.2%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
171GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXB7401Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 340 264 266 258 262 256 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
57.7% Above average
Read 471
Write 395
Mixed 271
SusWrite 274
79% 353 MB/s
4K Read 11
4K Write 17.9
4K Mixed 11.2
40% 13.4 MB/s
DQ Read 315
DQ Write 122
DQ Mixed 193
150% 210 MB/s
Poor: 106%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 236%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 1TB-$65
931GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 109 113 113 109 109 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
46.6% Average
Read 57.5
Write 68.3
Mixed 81.6
SusWrite 104
58% 77.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.3
224% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CRC 04EF TEAMGROUP-SD4-2400 32GB
2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
58.2% Above average
MC Read 21.6
MC Write 27.9
MC Mixed 21.2
67% 23.6 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 12.6
SC Mixed 6.8
23% 8.13 GB/s
Latency 235
17% 235 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GL503VM Builds (Compare 554 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

System: Asus GL503VM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback