HP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3397
Memory23 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, , 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130716
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateFeb 17 '23 at 08:27
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing below expectations (30th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3470 CPU @ 3.20GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
65.5% Good
Memory 81.7
1-Core 61.1
2-Core 174
61% 106 Pts
4-Core 276
8-Core 340
40% 308 Pts
64-Core 325
20% 325 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
MSI(1462 8C93) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.43% Terrible
Lighting 4.1
Reflection 3.9
Parallax 4.4
3% 4.13 fps
MRender 4.2
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 4.9
4% 4.33 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.43%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU630 240GB
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V8X01c87
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 55 45 54 57 54 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
44.2% Average
Read 528
Write 31.3
Mixed 12.4
SusWrite 60.4
33% 158 MB/s
4K Read 32.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 12.6
66% 15.1 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 101%
Sandisk PLUS 1000GB
182GB free
Firmware: 9128
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 150 151 117 41 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
33.3% Below average
Read 319
Write 293
Mixed 189
SusWrite 107
51% 227 MB/s
4K Read 12
4K Write 17.9
4K Mixed 8.5
38% 12.8 MB/s
DQ Read 55.5
DQ Write 55.5
DQ Mixed 10.9
20% 40.6 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 33.3%
Great: 58%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$98
2.5TB free
Firmware: 9128
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 150 151 117 41 20 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Read 173
Write 179
Mixed 35.7
SusWrite 107
89% 124 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
149% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 108%
ST4000DM 004-2CV104 4TB
3TB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.1 3.1 3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
9.86% Terrible
Read 53.9
Write 23.9
Mixed 24.9
SusWrite 3.2
30% 26.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.8
44% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 9.86%
Great: 70%
CT1000BX 500SSD1 1TB
927GB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 24 24 24 24 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
19.9% Very poor
Read 56.6
Write 25.5
Mixed 27.7
SusWrite 24.2
40% 33.5 MB/s
4K Read 11.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 5.5
271% 6.1 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 19.9%
Great: 169%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown GR8GU16H5128-16 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
56.4% Above average
MC Read 20.2
MC Write 22
MC Mixed 17.4
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 17
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 77.4
52% 77.4 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq Elite 8300 SFF Builds (Compare 5,433 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback