HP h8-1417c

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics67.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
16 months ago, 16 months ago.
SystemHP h8-1417c  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON 2AD5
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121023
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 17 '23 at 03:18
Run Duration108 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
67.3% Good
Memory 79.8
1-Core 90.5
2-Core 170
66% 114 Pts
4-Core 297
8-Core 420
45% 358 Pts
64-Core 438
27% 438 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
Legend(17AA C97A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 528.49
Performing below potential (54th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
67.9% Good
Lighting 92
Reflection 73.9
Parallax 78.4
75% 81.4 fps
MRender 82.3
Gravity 67.6
Splatting 54.3
54% 68.1 fps
Poor: 64%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 70%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
2TB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP16
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 63 111 148 182 176 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
74.8% Very good
Read 136
Write 97.6
Mixed 81.9
SusWrite 125
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73BH0-CK0 M378B1G73DB0-CK0 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
55.2% Above average
MC Read 20.7
MC Write 19.6
MC Mixed 17.3
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 17.3
SC Mixed 17.4
50% 17.4 GB/s
Latency 80.9
49% 80.9 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 24.1" 1280 720 HWP26CF HP w2408
Typical h8-1417c Builds (Compare 29 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP h8-1417c

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $297
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback