Asus M52AD_M12AD_A_F_K31AD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics54% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive35% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (78%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
16 months ago, 13 months ago.
SystemAsus M52AD_M12AD_A_F_K31AD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK M52AD_M12AD_A_F_K31AD
Memory6.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150714
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateFeb 16 '23 at 19:16
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 78%
Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
41.6% Average
Memory 56.2
1-Core 72.8
2-Core 107
47% 78.6 Pts
4-Core 151
8-Core 191
22% 171 Pts
64-Core 184
11% 184 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$300
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 527.56
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
54% Above average
Lighting 69
Reflection 72.6
Parallax 68.2
56% 69.9 fps
MRender 57.7
Gravity 67.9
Splatting 57.5
50% 61 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 54%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
119GB free (System drive)
Firmware: K1B3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 183 188 172 20 26 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
35% Below average
Read 164
Write 17.9
Mixed 104
SusWrite 122
23% 102 MB/s
4K Read 15.3
4K Write 18.2
4K Mixed 12.7
49% 15.4 MB/s
DQ Read 125
DQ Write 146
DQ Mixed 128
98% 133 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 35%
Great: 102%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$26
931GB free
Firmware: A7L0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 187 187 188 192 185 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 188
Write 179
Mixed 40.4
SusWrite 187
107% 149 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
135% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 108%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73DB0-CK0 M378B5273DH0-CK0 12GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
33.4% Below average
MC Read 11.2
MC Write 13.1
MC Mixed 10.8
33% 11.7 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 12
SC Mixed 10.6
29% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 139
29% 139 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M52AD_M12AD_A_F_K31AD Builds (Compare 538 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Asus M52AD_M12AD_A_F_K31AD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $222
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback