Huananzhi X79

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics28.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive117% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
15 months ago, 15 months ago.
MotherboardHuananzhi X79  (all builds)
Memory25 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210423
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 15 '23 at 22:00
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2690 v2-$142
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
66.8% Good
Memory 80.7
1-Core 78.9
2-Core 156
62% 105 Pts
4-Core 285
8-Core 546
49% 416 Pts
64-Core 1,001
62% 1,001 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 85D6) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 527.56
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.1% Poor
Lighting 35
Reflection 40.1
Parallax 37.4
28% 37.5 fps
MRender 37.8
Gravity 37.8
Splatting 27
27% 34.2 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 28.1%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS240G2G0C-00AJM0 240GB
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 231050WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 353 113 98 110 95 113 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 1,334
Write 940
Mixed 448
SusWrite 147
158% 717 MB/s
4K Read 32.4
4K Write 66.5
4K Mixed 37
132% 45.3 MB/s
DQ Read 457
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 224
193% 292 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 117%
Great: 189%
Sandisk PLUS 480GB
446GB free
Firmware: UG4500RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 386 111 152 289 300 290 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
54.7% Above average
Read 431
Write 361
Mixed 277
SusWrite 255
74% 331 MB/s
4K Read 11.6
4K Write 30.2
4K Mixed 16.5
55% 19.4 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 97.8
DQ Mixed 43.1
50% 86.5 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 61%
HP S700 120GB-$30
94GB free
Firmware: S0704A1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 238 237 236 239 241 238 MB/s
Performing below potential (56th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
65.2% Good
Read 257
Write 233
Mixed 238
SusWrite 238
54% 242 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 52.3
4K Mixed 25.9
104% 35.5 MB/s
DQ Read 208
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 48.5
78% 150 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 95%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB-$22
16GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 59 59 60 60 60 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
34.3% Below average
Read 59.7
Write 55.2
Mixed 45.8
SusWrite 59.6
41% 55.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 61%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
152GB free
Firmware: 05.01A05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 107 110 111 113 110 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
53.6% Above average
Read 75.8
Write 76
Mixed 51.9
SusWrite 111
58% 78.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
151% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 53.6%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C10D3/ KHX1600C10D3/ HX316C10F/8 HX316C10F/8 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
95.8% Outstanding
MC Read 41.9
MC Write 37.2
MC Mixed 36.2
110% 38.4 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 10.8
SC Mixed 9.9
33% 11.6 GB/s
Latency 79.2
50% 79.2 ns
Poor: 96%
This bench: 95.8%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79 Builds (Compare 673 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Huananzhi X79

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $158
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback