User System

Performance Results


Gaming 22% Surfboard	Desktop 80% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	26.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	80.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	ECT
Motherboard	MSI B85M-E45 (MS-7817)
Memory	4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140722
Uptime	2.4 Days
Run Date	Nov 22 '17 at 15:22
Run Duration	137 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	26%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4590-$188 151,366 User benchmarks, average bench 63% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	75.9% Very good	Memory 87.7 1-Core 98.4 2-Core 199 74% 128 Pts	4-Core 370 8-Core 379 50% 375 Pts	64-Core 376 23% 376 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 75.9% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209 161,132 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Palit(1569 1187) 2GB CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing below potential (65^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	26.4% Poor	Lighting 30.8 Reflection 28.5 Parallax 35.9 25% 31.7 fps	MRender 39.2 Gravity 36.4 Splatting 31.6 29% 35.7 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 26.4% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial M550 256GB-$152 8,333 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 34GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 5989 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1642 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 94 94 199 (AE) Unknown 100 100 82 (B4) Unknown 0 0 2159 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 66 45 236224315426 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 16 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 94 94 6 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 33199046747 (F7) Unknown 100 100 1044684851 (F8) Unknown 100 100 577771096	80.7% Excellent	Read 512 Write 473 Mixed 467 108% 484 MB/s	4K Read 23.6 4K Write 73.9 4K Mixed 17.9 98% 38.5 MB/s	DQ Read 26.8 DQ Write 85.1 DQ Mixed 16.4 24% 42.8 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 80.7% Great: 113%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 1TB free Firmware: MX6OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 140 140 68 (03) Spinup time 135 135 34387591593 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 2245 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 6781 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1547 (C0) Power-off retract count 96 96 4937 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 96 96 4937 (C2) HDA temperature 171 171 210454577187 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	93.2% Outstanding	Read 167 Write 158 Mixed 153 120% 159 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.64 4K Mixed 0.19 85% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 93.2% Great: 107%
Seagate ST380815AS 1TB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 455GB free Firmware: CC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 114 99 79983336 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2506 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 74 60 4321322674 (09) Power-on hours count 92 92 7076 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1642 (B7) Unknown 85 85 15 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 88 8590066005 (BD) vendor-specific 97 97 3 (BE) vendor-specific 70 50 554958878 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 48 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 77 77 46626 (C2) HDA temperature 30 50 42949672990 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 193 23 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 33689723473330 (F1) Unknown 100 253 28702045882 (F2) Unknown 100 253 195754717414	71.4% Very good	Read 122 Write 127 Mixed 104 88% 118 MB/s	4K Read 0.87 4K Write 1.59 4K Mixed 0.16 83% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 71.4% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
MMXIV 1x8GB 335 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	30% Below average	MC Read 9.4 MC Write 10.4 MC Mixed 8.6 27% 9.47 GB/s	SC Read 9.2 SC Write 10.3 SC Mixed 8.3 26% 9.27 GB/s	Latency 69.9 57% 69.9 ns
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 30% Great: 33%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

User System

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)