TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Dell PowerEdge T320

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (4th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 96 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics10.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory88GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 88GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell PowerEdge T320
MotherboardDell PowerEdge T320  (all builds)
Memory77.9 GB free of 88 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors, 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200108
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateFeb 15 '23 at 15:16
Run Duration202 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2470 v2
CPU1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
49.5% Average
Memory 68.2
1-Core 30.5
2-Core 130
44% 76.1 Pts
4-Core 170
8-Core 235
26% 203 Pts
64-Core 936
58% 936 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑
This bench: 49.5%
 Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
EVGA(3842 3967)
CLim: 1544 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.94
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
10.8% Very poor
Lighting 0.3
Reflection 46.4
Parallax 0.2
0% 15.6 fps
MRender 35.4
Gravity 42.8
Splatting 37
31% 38.4 fps
Poor: 30% ↑
This bench: 10.8%
 Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Dell PERC H710 299GB
118GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 93 46 39 48 30 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Dell PERC H710 1TB
723GB free
Firmware: 3.13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 119 93 82 104 70 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 64% Great: 99%
Dell PERC H710 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 3.13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 139 111 103 118 84 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Maxtor OneTouch 2TB
922GB free, PID 7310
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 16 16 15 14 12 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
12.6% Very poor
Read 52.7
Write 24.2
Mixed 25
SusWrite 15
34% 29.2 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.8
50% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑
This bench: 12.6%
 Great: 17%
WD My Passport 1TB
931GB free, PID 0748
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 16 15 14 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
11.3% Very poor
Read 53.5
Write 23.7
Mixed 22
SusWrite 14.8
33% 28.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.8
32% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑
This bench: 11.3%
 Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 36KSZF1G72PZ-1G4D1 00AD00B300AD HMT42GR7CMR4C-G7 00AD00B300AD HMT42GR7CMR4C-G7 00AD04B300AD HMT42GR7AFR4A-H9 00AD04B300AD HMT42GR7AFR4A-PB 00CE00B300CE M393B2G70BH0-YH9 88GB
1333, 1066, 1066, 1333, 1600, 1333 MHz
8192, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.6% Average
MC Read 21
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 17.8
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 8.6
SC Mixed 4.3
22% 7.67 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 50% ↑
This bench: 49.6%
 Great: 52%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical PowerEdge T320 Builds (Compare 54 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Dell PowerEdge T320

CPU
Xeon E5-2470 v2IntelBench 63%, 279 samples18x
Xeon E5-2420 0IntelBench 58%, 1,039 samples12x
Xeon E5-2420 v2IntelBench 62%, 669 samples9x
GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia  $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples5x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia  $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples5x
RTX 2060Nvidia  $288Bench 90%, 645,160 samples5x
SSD
CS900 500GB SSDPNYBench 75%, 16,267 samples4x
MX100 256GBCrucial  $116Bench 83%, 55,768 samples3x
PERC H310 255GBDellBench 64%, 288 samples2x
RAM
18KSF1G72PDZ-1G6E1 00CE00B300CE M393B1G73QH0-YK0 00CE00B300CE M393B1G73QH0-YK0 24GBUnknownBench 72%, 7 samples4x
M393B1K70DH0-YK0 00AD00B300AD HMT31GR7CFR4A-PB 00CE04B300CE M393B1K70DH0-YK0 00CE04B300CE M393B1K70DH0-YK0 00CE04B300CE M393B1K70DH0-YK0 00AD00B300AD HMT31GR7CFR4A-PB 48GBUnknownBench 75%, 5 samples4x
HMT41GU6BFR8A-PB 04EF000004EF TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 04EF000004EF TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 00AD000000AD HMT41GU6BFR8A-PB 04EF000004EF TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 04EF000004EF TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 48GBUnknownBench 61%, 5 samples4x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 118% - Outstanding Total price: $59
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback