TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

To be filled by O.E.M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics16.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive218% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardTo be filled by O.E.M  (all builds)
Memory2.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211230
Uptime5.9 Days
Run DateFeb 15 '23 at 10:13
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1135G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
60.5% Good
Memory 46.8
1-Core 136
2-Core 237
73% 140 Pts
4-Core 404
8-Core 543
60% 474 Pts
64-Core 554
34% 554 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑
This bench: 60.5%
 Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Intel(8086 2212) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8729
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
16.6% Very poor
Lighting 20.7
Reflection 18.7
Parallax 23.7
17% 21 fps
MRender 18.9
Gravity 25
Splatting 15.8
16% 19.9 fps
Poor: 8% ↑
This bench: 16.6%
 Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
YSR256GMLCT-E3C-2 256GB
209GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFM90.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1020 1193 1173 1211 998 968 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
218% Outstanding
Read 925
Write 1,214
Mixed 997
SusWrite 1,094
240% 1,057 MB/s
4K Read 52.5
4K Write 217
4K Mixed 71.6
286% 114 MB/s
DQ Read 552
DQ Write 669
DQ Mixed 648
478% 623 MB/s
Poor: 125% ↑
This bench: 218%
 Great: 251%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston CBD26D4S9S1KC-4 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Relative performance (0th percentile)
43.1% Average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 21.5
MC Mixed 12.1
46% 15.9 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 15.7
SC Mixed 9.9
33% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 173
23% 173 ns
Poor: 45% ↑
This bench: 43.1%
 Great: 62%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical be filled by O.E.M Builds (Compare 40 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: To be filled by O.E.M

CPU
Core i5-8259UIntelBench 73%, 4,608 samples7x
Core i7-1255UIntelBench 65%, 11,564 samples5x
Core i5-10210UIntelBench 53%, 54,859 samples4x
GPU
Iris Plus Graphics 655IntelBench 9%, 8,316 samples7x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 5%, 110,580 samples6x
GTX 1650Nvidia  $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples6x
SSD
OM8P0S3256B-A0 256GBKingstonBench 69%, 154 samples3x
YSR512GMLCT-E3C-2 512GBBench 182%, 5 samples3x
YSR256GMLCT-E3C-2 256GBBench 190%, 6 samples3x
RAM
CBD26D4S9S8K1C-8 1x8GBKingstonBench 38%, 40 samples5x
CBD26D4S9S1KC-4 2x4GBKingstonBench 52%, 7 samples4x
GMA16G4SCL196P-26 1x16GBUnknownBench 38%, 44 samples3x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback