Asrock AM1H-ITX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics14.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive48.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock AM1H-ITX  (all builds)
Memory9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150429
Uptime16.4 Days
Run DateFeb 14 '23 at 21:20
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 36%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 5370 APU R3
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
35.8% Below average
Memory 56.7
1-Core 32.3
2-Core 64.7
34% 51.2 Pts
4-Core 86.6
8-Core 101
12% 93.8 Pts
64-Core 100
6% 100 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 42%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Asus(1043 85F4) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
14.3% Very poor
Lighting 17.9
Reflection 18
Parallax 18.2
15% 18 fps
MRender 15.4
Gravity 18.9
Splatting 16.5
14% 16.9 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.3%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3J96R9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 67 60 54 53 65 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
48.5% Average
Read 408
Write 325
Mixed 143
SusWrite 82.3
53% 240 MB/s
4K Read 20.3
4K Write 33.5
4K Mixed 12.9
65% 22.2 MB/s
DQ Read 200
DQ Write 157
DQ Mixed 93.9
93% 150 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 82%
Seagate ST5000LM000-2AN170 5TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 119 124 117 118 124 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
53.2% Above average
Read 64.9
Write 90.8
Mixed 58.4
SusWrite 120
61% 83.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 0.6
164% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 64%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2004)-$46
785GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 7101
Mixed 74.5
2,567% 3,588 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 9905471-058.A00LF 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
19% Very poor
MC Read 7.5
MC Write 4.5
MC Mixed 6.7
18% 6.23 GB/s
SC Read 5.1
SC Write 4.7
SC Mixed 7.4
16% 5.73 GB/s
Latency 138
29% 138 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 19%
Great: 19%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical AM1H-ITX Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 35%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock AM1H-ITX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 11% - Very poor Total price: $226
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback