BLEU KUBB & OCTO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics15.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive190% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
15 months ago, 15 months ago.
SystemBLEU KUBB & OCTO  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel NUC11TNBi5
Memory21.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201030
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateFeb 14 '23 at 12:48
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1135G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
76.5% Very good
Memory 72.4
1-Core 145
2-Core 268
87% 162 Pts
4-Core 434
8-Core 632
67% 533 Pts
64-Core 628
39% 628 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Intel(8086 3002) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.3222
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
15.7% Very poor
Lighting 19.8
Reflection 23.8
Parallax 23.4
16% 22.3 fps
MRender 16
Gravity 23.8
Splatting 15.7
15% 18.5 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 20%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apacer AS2280Q4 1000GB
672GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AP112PJ0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1315 753 684 748 719 721 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
190% Outstanding
Read 1,261
Write 1,140
Mixed 1,377
SusWrite 823
259% 1,150 MB/s
4K Read 37.5
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 52.8
183% 66.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,072
DQ Write 385
DQ Mixed 872
607% 776 MB/s
Poor: 177%
This bench: 190%
Great: 526%
Jmicron JMS583 480GB
447GB free
Firmware: 0204
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 30 30 30 30 30 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT32G4SFD832A.C16FB 1x31GB
1 of 1 slots used
31GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
47.3% Average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 18.9
MC Mixed 13.5
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 19.5
SC Mixed 15.4
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 95.9
42% 95.9 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical KUBB & OCTO Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: BLEU KUBB & OCTO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 110% - Outstanding Total price: $80
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback