| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 49.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus PRIME A320M-K (all builds) |
| Memory | 3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | Χρώματα 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20210713 |
| Uptime | 0.3 Days |
| Run Date | Feb 13 '23 at 19:11 |
| Run Duration | 195 Seconds |
| Run User | GRC-User |
| Background CPU | 36% |
PC Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
36%
Below average
|
40% 75.6 Pts
|
30% 221 Pts
|
12% 203 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1660-$200
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 527.56
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
49.6%
Average
|
48% 71.1 fps
|
54% 64.5 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$40
145GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
|
278% 1,253 MB/s
|
121% 40.4 MB/s
|
287% 380 MB/s
| |
|
|
88% 118 MB/s
|
184% 1.43 MB/s
| ||
|
|
18% 18.3 MB/s
|
98% 2.27 MB/s
| ||
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Silicon-Power SP004GBLFU213N02 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
59.2%
Above average
|
63% 22.1 GB/s
|
49% 17.1 GB/s
|
17% 237 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,109 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $69
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 5 2600AMD $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 1,470x |
| Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples | 1,308x |
| Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples | 1,008x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 954x |
| RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 737x |
| GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 657x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 100% - Outstanding | Total price: $345 |