Lenovo 82Q7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics9.54% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive93.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 82Q7  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2160 x 1350 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210917
Uptime5.5 Days
Run DateFeb 13 '23 at 17:15
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1165G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
69.2% Good
Memory 66.1
1-Core 140
2-Core 236
80% 147 Pts
4-Core 407
8-Core 470
57% 438 Pts
64-Core 232
14% 232 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Legend(17AA 382F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1660
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
9.54% Terrible
Lighting 11.9
Reflection 15.5
Parallax 14.6
10% 14 fps
MRender 10.9
Gravity 16.4
Splatting 7.8
9% 11.7 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.54%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZALQ1T0HALB-000L2 1TB
798GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BL2QFXV7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 183 148 185 208 161 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
93.9% Outstanding
Read 626
Write 313
Mixed 126
SusWrite 172
68% 309 MB/s
4K Read 28.5
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 32.9
141% 55.3 MB/s
DQ Read 538
DQ Write 175
DQ Mixed 264
219% 326 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 93.9%
Great: 236%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2G44AM0-CWE 1x16GB
1 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
41.4% Average
MC Read 16.4
MC Write 14.8
MC Mixed 12.1
41% 14.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 14.7
SC Mixed 11.6
37% 13 GB/s
Latency 111
36% 111 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 82Q7 Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 82Q7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback