MSI MS-17L2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics5.56% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive246% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
16 months ago, 15 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star Katana GF76 11UC
MotherboardMSI MS-17L2  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220624
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 12 '23 at 13:29
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11800H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
87.6% Excellent
Memory 75.5
1-Core 157
2-Core 309
96% 181 Pts
4-Core 535
8-Core 808
83% 671 Pts
64-Core 1,010
62% 1,010 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
MSI(1462 12EB) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.2079
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
5.56% Terrible
Lighting 10
Reflection 75.5
Parallax 12.2
8% 32.6 fps
MRender 1
Gravity 1
Splatting 0.2
0% 0.73 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.56%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PDP31024B-AI1 1TB
843GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFK0S03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1464 429 433 436 451 450 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
246% Outstanding
Read 1,402
Write 1,851
Mixed 1,390
SusWrite 610
296% 1,313 MB/s
4K Read 57.1
4K Write 240
4K Mixed 86
324% 128 MB/s
DQ Read 1,325
DQ Write 1,084
DQ Mixed 1,229
914% 1,213 MB/s
Poor: 118%
This bench: 246%
Great: 254%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43EB1-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
95.3% Outstanding
MC Read 38.8
MC Write 36.2
MC Mixed 31.2
101% 35.4 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 40.5
SC Mixed 19.2
73% 25.7 GB/s
Latency 89.3
45% 89.3 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 95.3%
Great: 105%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-17L2 Builds (Compare 2,435 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI MS-17L2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback