Acer Aspire V3-772G

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire V3-772G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer VA70_HW
Memory7.7 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140307
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 11 '23 at 21:21
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4702MQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
63.2% Good
Memory 79.8
1-Core 80.6
2-Core 149
62% 103 Pts
4-Core 253
8-Core 383
40% 318 Pts
64-Core 395
24% 395 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 72%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$112
766GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 226
Write 90.1
Mixed 106
31% 140 MB/s
4K Read 15.9
4K Write 30.6
4K Mixed 16.7
62% 21.1 MB/s
DQ Read 182
DQ Write 88.1
DQ Mixed 69.9
69% 113 MB/s
Poor: 48% Great: 128%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
194GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 470
Write 396
Mixed 366
91% 410 MB/s
4K Read 32.5
4K Write 33
4K Mixed 32.2
108% 32.6 MB/s
DQ Read 354
DQ Write 132
DQ Mixed 200
159% 229 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 118%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR16D3LS1KFG/4G 3x4GB
3 of 4 slots used
12GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
50.9% Above average
MC Read 19.3
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 15.6
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 15.7
SC Mixed 15.3
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 81
49% 81 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire V3-772G Builds (Compare 559 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire V3-772G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback