Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (91st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 9 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.37% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte H110M-S2
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H110M-S2-CF  (all builds)
Memory8.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1152 x 864 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180412
Uptime4.8 Days
Run DateFeb 11 '23 at 17:57
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 40%

 PC Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7500-$89
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
76.4% Very good
Memory 84.9
1-Core 107
2-Core 220
77% 137 Pts
4-Core 387
8-Core 420
53% 404 Pts
64-Core 426
26% 426 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6518
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
6.37% Terrible
Lighting 7.4
Reflection 6.3
Parallax 7.2
6% 6.97 fps
MRender 7.8
Gravity 6.6
Splatting 10.5
7% 8.3 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.37%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_M600_MTFDDAK128MBF 128GB
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU05
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 428
Write 408
Mixed 254
81% 363 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 80.9
4K Mixed 32.8
125% 46.7 MB/s
DQ Read 286
DQ Write 142
DQ Mixed 123
116% 184 MB/s
Poor: 58% Great: 101%
Amd-raid WDC WD20EZBX-75A 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 1A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 41 36 29 29 29 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 14% Great: 135%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
V02D4L84GB5285282400 859B CB8GU2400.C8JT 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
52.1% Above average
MC Read 20
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 15.2
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 18.3
SC Mixed 15.8
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 72
56% 72 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 66%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H110M-S2-CF Builds (Compare 1,954 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $182
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback