Lenovo 20DAS07100

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.76% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
16 months ago, 16 months ago.
SystemLenovo 20DAS07100  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Intel powered classmate PC
Memory0.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210429
Uptime2 Days
Run DateFeb 11 '23 at 17:37
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N2930
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.85 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
27.9% Poor
Memory 49.7
1-Core 19.2
2-Core 37.5
25% 35.5 Pts
4-Core 36.7
8-Core 44.3
5% 40.5 Pts
64-Core 64.5
4% 64.5 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 38%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)
Legend(17AA 2224) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4425
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
0.76% Terrible
Lighting 0.8
Reflection 0.9
Parallax 0.7
1% 0.8 fps
MRender 1.6
Gravity 0.8
Splatting 1.2
1% 1.2 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.76%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force LX 256GB-$129
188GB free (System drive)
Firmware: N0307A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 215 178 194 211 199 186 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
43.8% Average
Read 226
Write 218
Mixed 196
SusWrite 197
47% 209 MB/s
4K Read 14.4
4K Write 19.3
4K Mixed 18.4
56% 17.4 MB/s
DQ Read 136
DQ Write 93.9
DQ Mixed 111
84% 113 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 99%
SDHC Card 8GB
7GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.5 5.3 4.7 5 5 4.6 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
9.89% Terrible
Read 15.5
Write 1.2
Mixed 5.2
SusWrite 4.7
7% 6.65 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 2.4
160% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 9.89%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 1 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
12.4% Very poor
MC Read 3.8
MC Write 4.4
MC Mixed 4
12% 4.07 GB/s
SC Read 1.7
SC Write 3.5
SC Mixed 3.3
8% 2.83 GB/s
Latency 162
25% 162 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.4%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20DAS07100 Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20DAS07100

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 20% - Poor Total price: $14
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $64
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback