Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 51% Yacht	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	16.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	47.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 5GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Compaq dc7800p Convertible Minitower (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 0AACh
Memory	2.6 GB free of 5.00391 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20151023
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Feb 11 '23 at 13:06
Run Duration	153 Seconds
Run User	ZAF-User
Background CPU	47%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo E8400-$89 68,540 User benchmarks, average bench 40% XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	40.6% Average	Memory 68.7 1-Core 42.9 2-Core 72 41% 61.2 Pts	4-Core 75.4 8-Core 77.3 10% 76.4 Pts	64-Core 78.9 5% 78.9 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 40.6% Great: 47%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Nvidia(10DE 105F) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 528.24 Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	16.4% Very poor	Lighting 20.1 Reflection 17.3 Parallax 19.7 16% 19 fps	MRender 24.4 Gravity 21.5 Splatting 16 16% 20.6 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 16.4% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 306GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 144 152 180 189 211 206 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	47.6% Average	Read 196 Write 173 Mixed 178 SusWrite 180 41% 182 MB/s	4K Read 21.7 4K Write 32.4 4K Mixed 25.9 83% 26.7 MB/s	DQ Read 36 DQ Write 81.9 DQ Mixed 48.1 40% 55.3 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 47.6% Great: 134%
Seagate ST33000651AS 3TB-$78 5,029 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC44 SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 115 123 123 128 129 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	73.8% Very good	Read 135 Write 141 Mixed 60.1 SusWrite 122 84% 115 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1.1 191% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 73.8% Great: 86%
Seagate ST3500630NS 42D0392 42D0002IBMV 500GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 36GB free Firmware: 3.AEP SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 48 50 49 75 77 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	33.5% Below average	Read 58.5 Write 61.3 Mixed 43.4 SusWrite 58 41% 55.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.4 99% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 33.5% Great: 40%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 41GB 2,583 User benchmarks, average bench 17% null MHz 1024, 2048, 1024, 1024, 36864 MB Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	15.7% Very poor	MC Read 4.6 MC Write 5.5 MC Mixed 4.3 14% 4.8 GB/s	SC Read 3.7 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 4 12% 4.23 GB/s	Latency 104 38% 104 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 15.7% Great: 23%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 46%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core2 Duo E8500Intel $110Bench 42%, 18,841 samples	11x
Core2 Quad Q9300Intel $38Bench 46%, 10,428 samples	9x
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	7x

GPU
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	12x
Radeon HD 4670ATIBench 4%, 21,442 samples	7x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	6x

SSD
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	5x
SSD 240GB240gBench 67%, 183 samples	3x
MZ7TY128HDHP-000H1 128GBSamsungBench 86%, 152 samples	2x

Value: 44% - Average

Total price: $162

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16