Asus A68HM-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics3.67% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive52.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus A68HM-K  (all builds)
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181008
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 11 '23 at 02:04
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-7400K APU (2014 D.Ka)
FM2+ , 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
26.9% Poor
Memory 46.1
1-Core 56.6
2-Core 61
35% 54.6 Pts
4-Core 43.4
8-Core 75.8
7% 59.6 Pts
64-Core 75.2
5% 75.2 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 26.9%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
Asus(1043 85CB) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 17.12
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
3.67% Terrible
Lighting 4.3
Reflection 5.2
Parallax 6.3
4% 5.27 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 4.8
Splatting 6.2
4% 4.63 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.67%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
KingstonSA400S37 120GB
0GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FW201105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 301 295 304 331 328 335 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
52.4% Above average
Read 266
Write 222
Mixed 228
SusWrite 316
58% 258 MB/s
4K Read 14.5
4K Write 42.7
4K Mixed 9.1
56% 22.1 MB/s
DQ Read 103
DQ Write 176
DQ Mixed 19.6
49% 99.7 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 71%
Seagate ST500DM002 500GB
0GB free
Firmware: SC13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 97 98 104 104 103 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
53.7% Above average
Read 86.5
Write 90.7
Mixed 48.5
SusWrite 100
60% 81.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 102%
StoreJet Transcend 1TB
0GB free, PID 7000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 28 28 30 30 29 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
14.6% Very poor
Read 52.6
Write 25.7
Mixed 24.1
SusWrite 28.9
40% 32.8 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.7
34% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5403-009.A00L 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
19.4% Very poor
MC Read 6.7
MC Write 6.3
MC Mixed 6.9
19% 6.63 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 6.1
16% 5.67 GB/s
Latency 176
23% 176 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 19.4%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A68HM-K Builds (Compare 641 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus A68HM-K

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback