HP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-dc0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.71% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive78.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-dc0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 84DA
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190611
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 11 '23 at 01:30
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
58.2% Above average
Memory 73.8
1-Core 67.4
2-Core 125
54% 88.7 Pts
4-Core 232
8-Core 349
36% 291 Pts
64-Core 465
29% 465 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
HP(103C 84DA) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6345
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
4.71% Terrible
Lighting 4.6
Reflection 30
Parallax 5.3
4% 13.3 fps
MRender 8.6
Gravity 6.1
Splatting 9
7% 7.9 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.71%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Liteon CA3-8D128-HP 128GB
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: A381
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 101 93 97 99 117 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
78.1% Very good
Read 808
Write 163
Mixed 217
SusWrite 99.4
70% 322 MB/s
4K Read 20.6
4K Write 50.7
4K Mixed 30.8
98% 34 MB/s
DQ Read 349
DQ Write 57.9
DQ Mixed 142
120% 183 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 137%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3T0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 111 113 109 114 114 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
62.2% Good
Read 104
Write 122
Mixed 35.8
SusWrite 112
68% 93.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.5
116% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4SFS8266.C8FE Kingston HP26D4S9S8ME-8 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
63.3% Good
MC Read 25.9
MC Write 25.1
MC Mixed 19.6
67% 23.5 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 20
SC Mixed 16.2
43% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 93
43% 93 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OMEN by HP Laptop 15-dc0xxx Builds (Compare 3,759 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

System: HP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-dc0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback