HP Compaq 8000 Elite CMT PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.27% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 4GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Compaq 8000 Elite CMT PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3647h
Memory2.2 GB free of 4.00391 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20091022
Uptime5 Days
Run DateDec 22 '15 at 15:03
Run Duration186 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo E8400-$89
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
45.4% Average
Memory 78
1-Core 42.2
2-Core 72.6
44% 64.3 Pts
4-Core 77.5
8-Core 83.3
11% 80.4 Pts
64-Core 85.1
5% 85.1 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210
Asus(1043 83F4) 1GB
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.4192
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.27% Terrible
Lighting 1.3
Reflection 2.5
Parallax 0.5
1% 1.43 fps
MRender 3.29
Gravity 0.3
Splatting 2.52
2% 2.04 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.27%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDS721025CLA382 250GB-$20
103GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JP1OA3BF Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
69.8% Good
Read 123
Write 121
Mixed 16.1
62% 86.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.63
4K Write 1.37
4K Mixed 0.44
100% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 75%
TOSHIBA MK6025GAS 60GB
56GB free, PID null
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
6.87% Terrible
Read 11.3
Write 13.1
Mixed 6.34
13% 10.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.36
4K Write 0.74
4K Mixed 0.18
33% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 6.87%
Great: 11%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 CE M378B5673EH1-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5673EH1-CH9 40GB
1333, 1333, 0 MHz
2048, 2048, 36864 MB
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
22.6% Poor
MC Read 8.3
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 6.4
20% 7.1 GB/s
SC Read 6.7
SC Write 6.3
SC Mixed 6.3
18% 6.43 GB/s
Latency 84.3
47% 84.3 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 22.6%
Great: 31%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq 8000 Elite CMT PC Builds (Compare 321 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 8000 Elite CMT PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $117
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback