HP Z400 Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive70.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Z400 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0B4Ch
Memory9 GB free of 12.002 GB @ 1.6 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180305
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 10 '23 at 15:10
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W3565
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
59.8% Above average
Memory 76.9
1-Core 80.7
2-Core 156
62% 104 Pts
4-Core 243
8-Core 276
34% 259 Pts
64-Core 271
17% 271 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 74%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
97GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 214 237 241 242 240 241 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
70.2% Very good
Read 250
Write 239
Mixed 236
SusWrite 236
54% 240 MB/s
4K Read 31.9
4K Write 50.5
4K Mixed 36.8
122% 39.7 MB/s
DQ Read 181
DQ Write 166
DQ Mixed 164
126% 170 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 129%
Seagate Laptop Thin SSHD 2.5" 500GB-$23
323GB free
Firmware: DEM9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 111 112 112 111 111 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
63.5% Good
Read 110
Write 106
Mixed 61.6
SusWrite 111
71% 97.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
119% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 CE M378B5173DB0-CK0 ID:80 CE M378B5173DB0-CK0 ID:80 CE M378B5173DB0-CK0 46GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 34816 MB
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
36.1% Below average
MC Read 14
MC Write 10.7
MC Mixed 13.5
36% 12.7 GB/s
SC Read 7.8
SC Write 7.8
SC Mixed 9.4
24% 8.33 GB/s
Latency 86.5
46% 86.5 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z400 Workstation Builds (Compare 3,352 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z400 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $258
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback