Lenovo 20J6CTO1WW

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics2.77% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive86% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
15 months ago, 15 months ago.
SystemLenovo 20J6CTO1WW  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20J6CTO1WW
Memory7.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220222
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 10 '23 at 01:40
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
72.4% Very good
Memory 80.1
1-Core 102
2-Core 196
72% 126 Pts
4-Core 349
8-Core 501
53% 425 Pts
64-Core 487
30% 487 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
Legend(17AA 505E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8854
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
2.77% Terrible
Lighting 2.8
Reflection 11.4
Parallax 3.2
2% 5.8 fps
MRender 4.2
Gravity 2.7
Splatting 6.1
4% 4.33 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.77%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
196GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 352 325 376 307 191 161 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
86% Excellent
Read 449
Write 364
Mixed 377
SusWrite 286
83% 369 MB/s
4K Read 27.9
4K Write 51.5
4K Mixed 34
113% 37.8 MB/s
DQ Read 367
DQ Write 325
DQ Mixed 341
257% 344 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 86%
Great: 134%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RMSA3270MB86H9F2400 859B BLS8G4S240FSDK.8FBD 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
60.5% Good
MC Read 23.2
MC Write 23.3
MC Mixed 17.9
61% 21.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 23.6
SC Mixed 16.3
51% 17.7 GB/s
Latency 80.3
50% 80.3 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 20J6CTO1WW Builds (Compare 45 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20J6CTO1WW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback