bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.03% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
System
MotherboardGigabyte GA-MA770-DS3
Memory3.6 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.7 GHz
DisplayΧρώματα 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090116
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 21 '17 at 11:02
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 920
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
51.2% Above average
Memory 74.6
1-Core 40.3
2-Core 83
43% 66 Pts
4-Core 164
8-Core 164
22% 164 Pts
64-Core 163
10% 163 Pts
Poor: 41%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 240
Asus(1043 048B) 2GB
CLim: 780 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.9.1
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
6.03% Terrible
Lighting 7.27
Reflection 8.77
Parallax 9.12
6% 8.39 fps
MRender 7.76
Gravity 6.33
Splatting 8.43
6% 7.51 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.03%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Msft Virtual HD 537GB
476GB free
Firmware: 10.0
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
58.9% Above average
Read 103
Write 102
Mixed 99
76% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.83
4K Write 1.97
4K Mixed 0.27
101% 1.02 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 59%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72
217GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
31.1% Below average
Read 48.6
Write 59.6
Mixed 47.6
39% 51.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.41
4K Write 1.21
4K Mixed 0.28
70% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 31.1%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3x2GB
3 of 4 slots used
6GB DIMM
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
20.5% Poor
MC Read 6
MC Write 6.3
MC Mixed 7.1
18% 6.47 GB/s
SC Read 5
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 6.2
16% 5.5 GB/s
Latency 91.3
44% 91.3 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 20.5%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,496 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback