TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

MSI MS-16P1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics78.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive242% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 16 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago, 15 months ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
SystemMicro-Star GE63VR 7RF
MotherboardMSI MS-16P1  (all builds)
Memory14.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180313
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 09 '23 at 00:57
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
73.8% Very good
Memory 97.2
1-Core 85.3
2-Core 171
71% 118 Pts
4-Core 274
8-Core 420
43% 347 Pts
64-Core 410
25% 410 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑
This bench: 73.8%
 Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia TITAN Xp
MSI(1462 11F7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 381.89
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
78.1% Very good
Lighting 93.9
Reflection 119
Parallax 96.1
76% 103 fps
MRender 91.9
Gravity 97.9
Splatting 104
81% 98.1 fps
Poor: 78% ↑
This bench: 78.1%
 Great: 79%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$104
139GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 400 330 329 330 331 331 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
242% Outstanding
Read 2,427
Write 1,471
Mixed 1,299
SusWrite 342
306% 1,385 MB/s
4K Read 61.5
4K Write 136
4K Mixed 79.2
267% 92.3 MB/s
DQ Read 962
DQ Write 867
DQ Mixed 924
691% 918 MB/s
Poor: 160% ↑
This bench: 242%
 Great: 280%
Toshiba THNSNJ256G8NY 256GB
213GB free
Firmware: JYXA0101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 400 460 458 454 465 463 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 496
Write 132
Mixed 446
SusWrite 450
85% 381 MB/s
4K Read 24.4
4K Write 90
4K Mixed 42.9
140% 52.4 MB/s
DQ Read 367
DQ Write 309
DQ Mixed 338
253% 338 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑
This bench: 106%
 Great: 98%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
102% Outstanding
MC Read 39.7
MC Write 42
MC Mixed 29.1
106% 36.9 GB/s
SC Read 19.1
SC Write 34.4
SC Mixed 27.8
77% 27.1 GB/s
Latency 49.4
81% 49.4 ns
Poor: 72% ↑
This bench: 102%
 Great: 106%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical MS-16P1 Builds (Compare 433 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16P1

CPU
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples425x
Core i5-7300HQIntelBench 57%, 170,871 samples8x
GPU
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples184x
GTX 1070 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 72%, 73,882 samples162x
GTX 1060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 47%, 177,775 samples82x
SSD
THNSNJ256G8NY 256GBToshibaBench 76%, 12,683 samples92x
THNSN5256GPU7 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBToshibaBench 148%, 19,151 samples44x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung  $104Bench 235%, 154,949 samples19x
RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 62,266 samples65x
MSI24D4S7D8MH-16 1x16GBKingstonBench 42%, 4,184 samples56x
MSI24D4S7S8MB-8 2x8GBKingstonBench 71%, 20,148 samples46x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback