HP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF

Performance Results


Gaming 35% Sail boat	Desktop 76% Battleship	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	45.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	86.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Run History

16 months ago, 1 month ago.

System	HP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 3397
Memory	26.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20190410
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 08 '23 at 22:32
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	2%

Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1275 V2-$400 461 User benchmarks, average bench 74% Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1275 V2 @ 3.50GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	68.4% Good	Memory 83.2 1-Core 97 2-Core 165 68% 115 Pts	4-Core 290 8-Core 443 45% 366 Pts	64-Core 439 27% 439 Pts
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 68.4% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155 259,091 User benchmarks, average bench 43% MSI(1462 8D92) CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 2100 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 528.24 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	45.6% Average	Lighting 59.5 Reflection 84.1 Parallax 52.1 48% 65.2 fps	MRender 44.6 Gravity 53.4 Splatting 48.6 40% 48.9 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 45.6% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$137 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 153GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 374 225 204 206 208 200 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	86.3% Excellent	Read 431 Write 410 Mixed 414 SusWrite 236 84% 373 MB/s	4K Read 31.5 4K Write 60.5 4K Mixed 40.2 131% 44.1 MB/s	DQ Read 331 DQ Write 281 DQ Mixed 243 200% 285 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 86.3% Great: 133%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$26 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 286GB free Firmware: MS2OA7C0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 145 145 141 149 146 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	77.2% Very good	Read 123 Write 147 Mixed 32 SusWrite 146 81% 112 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.7 146% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 77.2% Great: 107%
WD My Passport 0820 2TB 18,744 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 1.5TB free, PID 0820 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 27 26 27 27 27 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	14.4% Very poor	Read 56.6 Write 22.7 Mixed 24.4 SusWrite 27 39% 32.7 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.8 31% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 14.4% Great: 42%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT41GU6AFR8A-PB Micron 16JTF1G64AZ-1G6D1 HMT41GU6AFR8A-PB Micron 16JTF1G64AZ-1G6D1 32GB 4 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	54.8% Above average	MC Read 20.4 MC Write 19.4 MC Mixed 16.4 54% 18.7 GB/s	SC Read 17.3 SC Write 18.1 SC Mixed 18.6 51% 18 GB/s	Latency 74.7 54% 74.7 ns
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 54.8% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Compaq Elite 8300 SFF Builds (Compare 5,440 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	2,482x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	1,472x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	801x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	1,930x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	728x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	492x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	268x
MX500 1TBCrucial $84Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	83x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	78x

RAM
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 2x4GBMicronBench 52%, 17,707 samples	66x
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 53%, 17,809 samples	57x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	52x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $87

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359