Asus ProArt StudioBook W7600H5A_W7600H5A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.97% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive275% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
15 months ago, 15 months ago.
SystemAsus ProArt StudioBook W7600H5A_W7600H5A  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK W7600H5A
Memory49.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2400 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210830
Uptime11.5 Days
Run DateFeb 08 '23 at 20:00
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User SYR-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W-11955M
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
69.9% Good
Memory 55.5
1-Core 140
2-Core 263
80% 153 Pts
4-Core 452
8-Core 698
71% 575 Pts
64-Core 1,127
70% 1,127 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Asus(1043 17CC) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.3111
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
3.97% Terrible
Lighting 7.3
Reflection 150
Parallax 8.9
6% 55.3 fps
MRender 0.2
Gravity 0.1
Splatting 0.2
0% 0.17 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 3.97%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 4TB
2.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1575 1599 1720 1622 1757 1651 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
275% Outstanding
Read 2,310
Write 1,787
Mixed 1,820
SusWrite 1,654
425% 1,893 MB/s
4K Read 40.4
4K Write 88.4
4K Mixed 58.3
183% 62.4 MB/s
DQ Read 788
DQ Write 280
DQ Mixed 560
407% 543 MB/s
Poor: 147%
This bench: 275%
Great: 672%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Apacer D43.27304S.002 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
65.9% Good
MC Read 25.2
MC Write 27.4
MC Mixed 21.7
71% 24.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 24.9
SC Mixed 13.8
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 142
28% 142 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProArt StudioBook W7600H5A_W7600H5A Builds (Compare 29 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 108%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 108%
UFO

System: Asus ProArt StudioBook W7600H5A_W7600H5A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback