Colorful CVN B550M GAMING FROZEN

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics66.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive86.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemColorful CVN B550M GAMING FROZEN  (all builds)
MotherboardColorful CVN B550M GAMING FROZEN
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220625
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateFeb 08 '23 at 05:40
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User NPL-User
Background CPU 19%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
90.3% Outstanding
Memory 83
1-Core 164
2-Core 313
100% 187 Pts
4-Core 524
8-Core 860
85% 692 Pts
64-Core 997
62% 997 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 90.3%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
MSI(1462 C757) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 512.95
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
66.1% Good
Lighting 79.5
Reflection 90.2
Parallax 82.8
65% 84.2 fps
MRender 109
Gravity 78.3
Splatting 71.1
69% 86.1 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 76%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
UL 512GB SSD 512GB
421GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FW201105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 395 386 404 405 395 402 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
86.1% Excellent
Read 444
Write 410
Mixed 358
SusWrite 398
91% 402 MB/s
4K Read 39.8
4K Write 86.4
4K Mixed 12
121% 46.1 MB/s
DQ Read 176
DQ Write 272
DQ Mixed 15.8
70% 154 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TL416G36S818CSPSWK 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
57% Above average
MC Read 21
MC Write 19.7
MC Mixed 17.8
56% 19.5 GB/s
SC Read 19.5
SC Write 19.1
SC Mixed 18.8
55% 19.1 GB/s
Latency 75.2
53% 75.2 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CVN B550M GAMING FROZEN Builds (Compare 33 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 129%
UFO

System: Colorful CVN B550M GAMING FROZEN

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $719
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback