Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 64% Destroyer	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 65% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	69.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	224% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Gigabyte X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF (all builds)
Memory	57.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20170626
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 21 '17 at 02:28
Run Duration	186 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7820X-$375 28,524 User benchmarks, average bench 80% CPU0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	83% Excellent	Memory 73.2 1-Core 126 2-Core 251 82% 150 Pts	4-Core 498 8-Core 834 81% 666 Pts	64-Core 1381 86% 1381 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 83% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500 167,107 User benchmarks, average bench 59% EVGA(3842 3988) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1557 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 382.53 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	69.7% Good	Lighting 90.3 Reflection 88.3 Parallax 78.6 74% 85.7 fps	MRender 81.6 Gravity 78.8 Splatting 70 62% 76.8 fps
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 69.7% Great: 66%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139 63,520 User benchmarks, average bench 266% 327GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B6Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	224% Outstanding	Read 1,982 Write 1,787 Mixed 1,651 403% 1,807 MB/s	4K Read 14.7 4K Write 69.5 4K Mixed 26.9 94% 37 MB/s	DQ Read 28.3 DQ Write 247 DQ Mixed 24 52% 99.6 MB/s
Poor: 159% ↑ This bench: 224% Great: 353%
Samsung SM951 AHCI PCIe M.2 256GB-$223 7,621 User benchmarks, average bench 175% 127GB free Firmware: BXW2500Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 10469 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1379 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 85 85 475 (AE) Unknown 99 99 291 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 859 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 68 18 32 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 99 99 121664 (F1) Unknown 99 99 79650 (F2) Unknown 99 99 58327	203% Outstanding	Read 1,917 Write 1,185 Mixed 1,375 330% 1,492 MB/s	4K Read 39.7 4K Write 108 4K Mixed 27.1 152% 58.2 MB/s	DQ Read 254 DQ Write 178 DQ Mixed 140 125% 191 MB/s
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 203% Great: 220%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$64 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2.5TB free Firmware: CC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (85^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 115 99 97180704 (03) Spinup time 93 92 0 (04) Start/Stop count 89 89 12189 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 81 60 123847828 (09) Power-on hours count 85 85 13234 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 83 83 17459 (B7) Unknown 91 91 9 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 1 124557328964 (BD) vendor-specific 80 80 20 (BE) vendor-specific 75 50 420806681 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 95 95 10782 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 69 69 62487 (C2) HDA temperature 25 50 12884901913 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 178 560 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -67907727908543 (F1) Unknown 100 253 165354257011 (F2) Unknown 100 253 195260763944	107% Outstanding	Read 181 Write 191 Mixed 177 138% 183 MB/s	4K Read 0.55 4K Write 1.58 4K Mixed 0.2 74% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 113%
WD Red 8TB (2016)-$180 4,231 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 4.5TB free Firmware: 0A83 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 151 151 38684066214 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 873 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 5113 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 711 (16) Unknown 100 100 100 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 2222 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 2222 (C2) HDA temperature 214 214 214749216796 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	87.8% Excellent	Read 164 Write 142 Mixed 151 115% 152 MB/s	4K Read 0.78 4K Write 1.42 4K Mixed 0.29 91% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 87.8% Great: 97%
Seagate BUP Slim BK 2TB 1,055 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 292GB free, PID ab24 Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	28.9% Poor	Read 77 Write 70.8 Mixed 42.6 78% 63.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.63 4K Write 0.69 4K Mixed 0.29 36% 0.54 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 28.9% Great: 51%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2133 C14 8x8GB 552 User benchmarks, average bench 111% 8 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	89.8% Excellent	MC Read 28.7 MC Write 49.8 MC Mixed 29.4 103% 36 GB/s	SC Read 6.9 SC Write 18.6 SC Mixed 10.2 34% 11.9 GB/s	Latency 94.3 42% 94.3 ns
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 89.8% Great: 121%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 275 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 102%

UFO

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 110%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X299 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF

CPU
Core i9-7900XIntel $393Bench 82%, 19,432 samples	72x
Core i7-7820XIntel $375Bench 80%, 28,524 samples	68x
Core i7-7800XIntel $216Bench 78%, 22,334 samples	47x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	56x
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	36x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	31x

SSD
MZVLB512HAJQ-000H1 512GBSamsungBench 209%, 20,750 samples	38x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $150Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	14x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $96Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	10x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	93x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	41x
2x16GBUnknownBench 91%, 46,387 samples	28x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 67% - Good

Total price: $878

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16