PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor. |
Graphics | 57% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 62.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus P8Z77-V LX (all builds) |
Memory | 4.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20140721 |
Uptime | 13.3 Days |
Run Date | Feb 07 '23 at 20:58 |
Run Duration | 145 Seconds |
Run User | ESP-User |
Background CPU | 48% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2500
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
|
29%
Poor
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
57%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 330 172 84 80 88 87 MB/s
|
62.7%
Good
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
931GB free
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 120 120 119 121 117 MB/s
|
63%
Good
|
|||
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85
943GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 116 116 115 118 114 MB/s
|
72.6%
Very good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston KHX1866C10D3/4G 9905403-173.A00LF KHX1866C10D3/4G 9905403-173.A00LF 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB
|
36.7%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples | 1,419x |
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 1,171x |
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples | 1,082x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 376x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 371x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 307x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 64% - Good | Total price: $364 |