MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37)

Performance Results


Gaming 84% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 87% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	97.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	270% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

15 months ago, 14 months ago, 14 months ago.

System	Micro-Star MS-7C37
Motherboard	MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37) (all builds)
Memory	57.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200109
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 07 '23 at 12:01
Run Duration	270 Seconds
Run User	PAK-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205 635,419 User benchmarks, average bench 86% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	84.6% Excellent	Memory 73 1-Core 138 2-Core 275 87% 162 Pts	4-Core 515 8-Core 941 87% 728 Pts	64-Core 1,424 88% 1,424 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 84.6% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510 319,148 User benchmarks, average bench 100% Zotac(19DA 6520) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.94 Performing below potential (32^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	97.9% Outstanding	Lighting 118 Reflection 106 Parallax 122 96% 115 fps	MRender 176 Gravity 109 Splatting 98.8 101% 128 fps
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 97.9% Great: 106%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150 331,647 User benchmarks, average bench 297% 197GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1358 1099 1087 1043 1053 1041 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	270% Outstanding	Read 2,249 Write 2,255 Mixed 1,566 SusWrite 1,114 403% 1,796 MB/s	4K Read 50.1 4K Write 86.3 4K Mixed 61.8 201% 66.1 MB/s	DQ Read 1,292 DQ Write 934 DQ Mixed 1,124 837% 1,117 MB/s
Poor: 214% ↑ This bench: 270% Great: 372%
WDC WD8004FRYZ-01VAEB0 8TB 824 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 1.5TB free Firmware: 01.01H01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 192 185 194 190 192 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	21.5% Poor	Read 176 Write 187 Mixed 88.6 SusWrite 191 36% 161 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 8.3 4K Mixed 1.6 9% 3.83 MB/s	DQ Read 2.4 DQ Write 7.6 DQ Mixed 4.6 4% 4.87 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 21.5% Great: 28%
WDC WD102PURX-64WCLY0 10TB 22 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 381GB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 128 134 133 129 129 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	16.1% Very poor	Read 129 Write 133 Mixed 90.7 SusWrite 131 27% 121 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 9.6 4K Mixed 1.7 9% 4.17 MB/s	DQ Read 2.3 DQ Write 8.1 DQ Mixed 3.8 3% 4.73 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 16.1% Great: 28%
Seagate ST8000VN004-2M2101 8TB 135 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 2.5TB free Firmware: SC60 SusWrite @10s intervals: 237 237 239 241 239 239 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 18% Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87 42,465 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 61GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 137 140 103 90 113 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	51.6% Above average	Read 60.1 Write 108 Mixed 69.9 SusWrite 120 66% 89.4 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0 76% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 51.6% Great: 90%
WD WD82PURX-64GVLY0 8TB 41 User benchmarks, average bench 114% 737GB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 137 128 106 120 125 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	70.2% Very good	Read 119 Write 125 Mixed 90.7 SusWrite 123 85% 115 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 7.9 4K Mixed 2.2 445% 3.8 MB/s
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 70.2% Great: 136%
WD WD8004FRYZ-0 8TB 837 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 2.5TB free Firmware: 01.01H01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 138 91 122 124 123 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	57.4% Above average	Read 71.7 Write 91.3 Mixed 55.4 SusWrite 127 63% 86.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 4.3 4K Mixed 1 220% 2 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 57.4% Great: 138%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Transcend JM3200HLE-32G 2x31.5GB 94 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 2 of 4 slots used 63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	56.5% Above average	MC Read 21.3 MC Write 18.8 MC Mixed 18 55% 19.4 GB/s	SC Read 20.2 SC Write 20.2 SC Mixed 20.6 58% 20.3 GB/s	Latency 94.6 42% 94.6 ns
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 56.5% Great: 112%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37) Builds (Compare 10,487 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37) - $179

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	1,930x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $175Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	1,531x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $119Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	1,293x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	764x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	620x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	596x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $96Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	500x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	378x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $150Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	368x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	429x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	268x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 89%, 92,468 samples	231x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $1,020

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16